Register of Cricket Commentary: Variation Across Spoken and Written Sportscasting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62019/1dkzr360Keywords:
Register, sportscasting, cricket, online written commentary, television commentary, play-by-play commentary, color commentary.Abstract
This corpus-based comparative study explores two modes of cricket commentary, that is, television commentary (SAT) and online written commentary (OWC), from the register perspective. The data collected from the ICC Twenty-20 World Cup, June 2009: Final Match, Inning 1 is analyzed in the light of Biber and Conrad (2009) framework. The results substantiate that, in comparison to OWC, the situation of SAT occasions more versatile and diverse functions thus compelling for more resourceful and frequent linguistic features. Although the relatively formulaic nature of OWC substantially limits the variety and productivity of linguistic features owing to more impelling situations, it strives to replicate SAT, which places it intermediate between the play-by-play and color versions of sportscasting. A lesser known and less-noticed (in register studies) register has been placed on record, which is envisaged as a healthy contribution to the studies on register variation.
References
Abbas, F., & Bidin, S. J. (2022). A critical analysis of the language planning and policy (LPP) in Pakistan and its impact on indigenous languages of Pakistan. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 85-96.
Ahmed, S. (2017). Stylistic analysis the English translations of Surah Rehman: A comparative study of multiple sources. Al Qalam, 22(1), 458-467.
Balzer-Siber, M. (2015). Functional and stylistic features of sports announcer talk: A discourse analysis of the register of major league soccer television broadcasts (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Retrieved October 09, 2015 from http://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2515.
Bhatti, A. M., Iqbal, M., & Abbas, F. (2021). Methodic Analysis of Language Teaching in Access Microscholarship Program: A New Perspective, Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 2(3), 73–91.
Biber, D. (1994). An analytical framework for register studies. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 31-56). New York: Oxford University Press.
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. New York: Cambridge University Press.
ESPN Cricinfo (2016). ESPN Cricinfo. Retireved January 03, 2016, from www.espncricinfo.com.
Ferguson, C. A. (1983). Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society, 12(2), 153-172.
Free CLAWS WWW tagger (2015). Free CLAWS tagger. Retrieved January 29, 2015, from Ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/claws/trial.html.
Humpolík, R. (2014). Language of football commentators: An analysis of live English football commentary (Unpublished BACHELOR’S THESIS). Masaryk University, Czech Republic.
Lewandowski, M. (2012). The language of online sports commentary in a comparative perspective. Lingua Posnaniences, LIV(1), 65-70.
Malik, M. A., Abbas, F., & Jawad, M. (2020). Narrative, Narrator and Narration: A structuralist and psycho-narrative reading of “The Kite Runner” by Khaled Husseini. Elementary Education Online, 19(4), 3746-3755.
Reaser, J. (2003). A quantitative approach to (sub) registers: The case of sports announcer talk. Discourse Studies, 5(3). 303-321.
Sharif, H., Iftikhar, A., & Abbas, F. (2022). Incongruencies between Theory of Language Universals and Phonological Development: A Case Study of Urdu Speaking Children. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(1), 379–389.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
